Check out market updates

Acta (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement) 2012

Castex F, Roithová Z, Alvaro A, Lambrinidis S (2012) Written declaration, pursuant to Rule 123 of the Regulation, on the lack of a transparent procedure for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and potentially offensive content, 8 March 2010 (PE439.564v01-00), para. Called on 14 October 2012 INTA (Management Committee) Rapporteur: Initially Kader Arif (S&D) (resigned in January 2012, David Martin (S&D) See for example Wessels (2010), quoted in Yu (2012), pp. 975-1094, at 1027. In: J. Rosén (ed.), Intellectual Property Rights at the Crossroads of Trade, Cheltenham, Elgar, 2012, pp. 167-181 While in the summer of 2012 it was rejected in Europe by a devastating 92% majority in the European Parliament, it remains a threat to other signatory countries that have ratified or have not yet ratified ACTA. While China was not invited, countries such as India and Brazil were formally invited to the negotiations and refused or refused to join from the outset, and expressed that they had no interest in joining such efforts to circumvent existing international forums and force developing countries to abide by much lower standards for proper procedure to deal with violations of rights of law. Commission Recommendation to the Council to authorise the Commission to open negotiations for a plurilateral trade agreement against counterfeiting (SEC (2008) 255 final/2), Brussels, 27. February 2008, (appeal on 14 October 2012). Trade representatives) presented the White House`s official position on ACTA as follows:[83] It should be noted, however, that many of the European Data Protection Supervisor`s concerns about compliance with three strikes helped reinforce the Internet shutdown policy, which, in fact, were not included in acta`s final text.

See also the second opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on ACTA of 24 April 2012, (called on 14 October 2012) and art. . . .